Gender diversity has a legitimate place in governance and, quite rightly so, it gets a lot of airtime. However, the value of diversity goes beyond addressing under-represented social groups. It makes different types of thinking available to solve complex business problems, optimise boardroom performance, and drive transformational business change. Homogeneous groupthink won’t achieve the best outcomes. What you need at the table is a range of opinions, experience, and knowledge, and a willingness to listen to them.
In recent years, shareholders have become more active and vocal in the area of diversity, demanding executive teams and boards that better re ect the range of an organisation’s customers and employees. During the 2010 AGM season,
for example, multiple boards and nomination committees were “subjected to increased scrutiny over their membership and selection processes.”
Much of this scrutiny is focused on gender equity. Some companies, such as the Big Four banks, have responded by embracing diversity voluntarily. Others have been persuaded by new ASX corporate governance guidelines, which mandate the establishment and reporting of gender equity programs. Since the guidelines were announced in January 2010, the number of women on ASX 200 boards has increased by more than 50 percent. But we can certainly do better — today just 13.8 percent of the ASX 200 board members are women.
READ THE FULL WHITE PAPER
DOWNLOADRelated Insights

The Power of Change
“How much longer should you wait?” This might well be the most important thing business leaders need to ask themselves in the first half of this century and nowhere is it truer than when it comes to the issue of energy.

Performance Reviews: this year, they mean more than you know...
Lift your view to the things that matter and you will realise that this year, there’s an even more fundamental consideration to ponder: there is a silent COVID reconciliation going on right now; one where people weigh up their inputs with your outputs. How you show up in this review and reward cycle matters more than ever before.

The Human Side of Managing Mergers
A common reason for M&A (mergers and acquisitions) failure is downplaying the people element. During due diligence, planning focuses on how to realise strategic and financial benefits such as access to new markets, distribution synergies and economies of scale. It’s often assumed the human side will take care of itself once the integrated entity is operational. Yet 3 out of 10 mergers fail for cultural reasons.